Defamation in Family Court Proceedings: Privilege and Limits

Family court proceedings — particularly custody disputes and divorce cases — frequently involve serious allegations that, if false, could constitute defamation. However, the intersection of family law and defamation law is complex, with privilege doctrines playing a central role.

Absolute Privilege in Family Court

Statements made in the course of judicial proceedings are generally protected by absolute privilege. This means that statements made by parties, witnesses, judges, and lawyers during family court hearings cannot form the basis of a defamation claim, regardless of whether they are true or false.

This protection is essential to the proper functioning of the court system — parties must be free to make allegations without fear of defamation claims, and witnesses must be able to give evidence candidly. However, the scope of absolute privilege in family proceedings has specific boundaries that are important to understand.

When Privilege Does Not Apply

Absolute privilege covers statements made "in the course of" proceedings. It does not protect false allegations made outside the courtroom or formal legal process. Common scenarios where privilege does not apply include:

• Telling friends, family, or neighbours about allegations made in court proceedings
• Posting about court proceedings on social media
• Making false reports to schools, employers, or other third parties
• Discussing allegations with people who are not involved in the proceedings

A parent who makes false allegations of abuse in court is protected by privilege. But if that same parent repeats those allegations on social media, to the other parent's employer, or to school staff outside of any formal process, those publications may be actionable as defamation.

False Allegations in Custody Disputes

False allegations of abuse, neglect, or domestic violence are, unfortunately, not uncommon in contested custody cases. While the family court has its own mechanisms for dealing with false allegations (including adverse inferences and cost orders), these do not compensate for the wider reputational harm caused when allegations are repeated outside court.

Individuals who face false allegations in family proceedings may have recourse to defamation claims for any republication of those allegations outside the privileged context. They may also have claims under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 if the false allegations form part of a pattern of harassing behaviour.

Reporting Restrictions and Privacy

Family court proceedings in England and Wales are generally private, and reporting restrictions prevent publication of identifying information about children involved in proceedings. Breaching these restrictions is a contempt of court — but it also creates a separate avenue of harm when false allegations are published in breach of reporting restrictions.

If someone publishes details of family court allegations on social media or to third parties, they may face both contempt proceedings and defamation claims. The combination of these legal tools can be powerful for protecting the reputation of wrongly accused parties.

Taking Action

If you are facing false allegations in family court that are being repeated outside the courtroom, document every instance carefully. Note who made the statement, to whom, when, and how you became aware of it. This evidence will be crucial for any defamation claim.

Our solicitors can advise on the interplay between family law and defamation law, helping you understand your options and develop a coordinated legal strategy. Contact us for a free case evaluation.

Related reading: Defamation by an ex-partner | What to do if someone is spreading lies | Defamation and mental health